|
Post by George on Mar 4, 2015 12:43:39 GMT -5
Robert: Just to kick this off, I'll add my two cents, even though you are already aware of them.
Yes, I use it a lot. Not necessarily for multiple copy blocks as in your example, but just for combinations like CC/CC - A; R3; D; D; D; etc.
And whether it's for multiple instances of the same command, or for collections of various ones, the parsing and execution complexities are the same.
George
|
|
bryman
Freshman Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by bryman on Mar 15, 2015 17:54:29 GMT -5
Rarely, and when I do it is similar to the instance mentioned by George. Anything more complicated would blow my mind. Your initial example of two CC/CC/A commands might be fine but swapping the target destinations would cause much confusion. I would tend to perform each copy as separate transactions. Much easier for a bear with little brain to understand.
|
|
|
Post by Jo on Mar 17, 2015 11:41:11 GMT -5
Never use more then one C/M-A/B in one interaction, but with some R.. and D.. linecommands as mentioned by George.
|
|
R60
Freshman Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by R60 on Mar 21, 2015 20:42:58 GMT -5
Yes, sometimes (but rare) I use some line command interactions. But more the way described by George or Jo.
But if used, I expect (of course) the same behavior like IBM ISPF.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2015 9:37:10 GMT -5
CTC SPF/Pro 5.0.4 supports more then one C/M-A/B in one interaction.
|
|
|
Post by TheFeDuke on Feb 15, 2016 17:16:42 GMT -5
I just noticed this thread. My habits send me this way frequently. I can even remember some silliness when I copied lines part way down a couple of times so that I could do them top down in multiples. I relish the power to propagate errors faster.
|
|